Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021
Isis, 2020
and Data and Society C rack open a New York City office building. What do you find? As I write this essay in June, in my apartment at the northern tip of Manhattan, the answer is: empty rooms. That is the case, at least, for the eleven-story tower where I worked this last year. The Data and Society Research Institute has left that space permanently. Most of our neighbors sent their workers home too. In 2006, Michelle Murphy invited readers to "crack open an office building" to see the workers who worked there, the chemical exposures they endured in their cubicles, the stresses they survived between glass-paneled walls. 1 I think now about my trip a few weeks ago to get my things from our office. I recall the vacant desks, the piles of green and gray carpet squares, my name in chalk written by a beloved colleague on a wall. That lonely space testified to our fears that an office could turn against its occupants. I and so many other office workers have been sent home to protect us from the viral load likely to build and spread in the sort of open-plan space that Murphy wrote about-and where we had been working. A book about undetectable chemical exposures in office buildings may seem an odd choice for thinking with and about a viral pandemic. After all, there is almost no doubt that hundreds of thousands of deaths around the world over the last year have been caused by SARS-CoV-2, a virus that, while far from fully understood, has been clearly identified. Murphy investigated a problem-called, among other names, "sick building syndrome"-that had no single agreedupon cause. It is the heart of Murphy's project to study the production of, and responses to, that uncertainty. But this brilliant book has aged very well and is ready to aid us in seeing the COVID pandemic more clearly. We just have to read it in the right light. Crack open Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty and what do you find? Surveys, for one thing. There are surveys answered by white women office workers organizing as women and workers to safeguard their health. Other surveys "objectified" the experiences of Environmental Protection Agency scientists in their Reagan-era, underfunded, broken-down, dirty headquarters. Still more surveys-probably the vast majority of such surveys-served the needs of private building investigators, a new brand of consultant hired by property managers to diagnose sick building syndrome and suggest solutions that would circumvent both labor 1
Business Information Review, 2020
This paper compiles a series of responses from key information professionals to the novel coronavirus pandemic of 2020. Respondents were invited to answer the questions how the pandemic has impacted on their work, and how it might change the way of working in the future. Contributors to the article include Scott Brown, Steve Dale, Denise Carter, Alison Day, Hal Kirkwood and Emily Hopkins.
The Georgia Library Quarterly, 2020
Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 2021
Many of us were conducting or planning fieldwork this spring 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic spread across the globe. Some of us had optimistically hoped that the virus might be waning or somehow under control within a few months. While the situation has improved in some countries such that everyday life is shifting to a "new normal," in other countries, the pandemic has worsened or reemerged after briefly subsiding.
Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, Mexican Journal of Phytopathology
Everything seemed to go well in the winter of 2019 in Mexico City, but it was exactly a year ago, on February of 2020 when television networks, news outlets and social networks informed that the first case of SARS-CoV-2 had been detected in Mexico. Until that moment, the student community belonging to higher education, which I was a part of, had seen a similar case 11 years before, in 2009, with the A H1N1 influenza, without evident consequences. With the help of digital technology, we got news from all over the world regarding the expansion of COVID-19. We would read about politicians establishing drastic and unimaginable preventive measures such as the closure of borders and airports, the use of face masks, eyewear, gloves, etc. Likewise, a ‘war’ broke out between the main global powers over security inputs and to find who was guilty and/or responsible for this virus. The blame was placed on the vendors and consumers of the market in the city of Wuhan in China, due to a bat soup o...
Art Education, 2021
Arizona Anthropologist, 2021
In mid-March of 2020, my partner and I returned home from a weeklong beach vacation. It was such a beautiful trip, we joked that for our honeymoon we'd have to go to the moon to top the time we shared together then. Traveling back to Arizona wasn't as much of a dream. We were already leery of being around crowds during our flight, in the airport, and on the bus ride home, as COVID-19 cases were rapidly increasing worldwide. A lot of my fear related to not knowing if I might infect my high-risk family members and others in my community when I returned home; I could have unknowingly been the cause of someone's death. To avoid this, I commenced extreme social distancing measures including visiting the grocery store only twice per month and taking evening walks, avoiding any contact with those outside my household. The pandemic was upon us and what had been unimaginable became our norm. During the beginning of the COVID-19 social distancing measures, I began working from home for my full-time job along with preparing for my PhD comps exam. The dominant belief that working from home was less productive than working in an office with a supervisor measuring every minute of Arizona Anthropologist 30.
PANDEMICS AND THE CHANGING BUILT ENVIRONMENT LEARNING FROM HISTORY, PLANNING OUR FUTURE , 2024
Viruses & bacteria have always been, and continue to be a possible threat to humanity, infecting and potentially killing millions. Some diseases are exaggerated while others are fatal, either way, the fear of death plagues our thoughts as a viral pandemic crisis threatens our existential being. In 2020, a virus identified as COVID-19 spread dramatically throughout the world, forcing different states and countries to declare a state of emergency, thereby enforcing a lockdown on its citizens. Such a phenomenon drives people to adapt to new living conditions. As a result, dwellings have been revitalized in their fundamental functions, reassuring us in their essential role as a “safe haven.” Due to the resurfacing of our dwelling’s importance, we started to adapt to different social measures, these measures that have been ignored for some time now are regaining their existential importance ever since they had been lost. This paper discusses the impact of the COVID-19 Virus on our dwelling habitats and social environment in an urban context. Moreover, we show examples of how dwellers remodified their interior spaces to enhance their overall well-being.
Design and Culture, 13:1, 2021
Editors’ Introduction to Special Issue (free access) This special issue of Design and Culture emerged from a call released in May 2020 while we were still in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Noting that the pandemic had radically altered our relations with things, spaces, and one another, we called for dispatches that would register and articulate its immediate and unfolding experience. In particular, we wanted to pay attention to the dramatically deepening systemic social and geopolitical inequities and new territorial divides it created, seen through design perspectives, approaches, and sensibilities. Our editorial brief was not specifically geared to collect examples of design “solutions” to identifiable (and obvious) design “problems” related to the pandemic. Rather, we aimed to convey a more nuanced and expanded notion of design as a social sensitivity, critical lens, and proposition of tangible values and aspirations. We were also interested in experiences from various subject positions, from those who spent the quarantine working or studying from home to essential workers and frontliners, aware that the virus was far from a “great equalizer” and that “risk is not equally distributed” (Jones 2020). In terms of format, we sought a variety of responses – from text to audio and visual work – that would capture the different affective and material dimensions of the pandemic experience.
Education Sciences, 2022
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Springer eBooks, 2022
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
IVT Network, 2021
Coronavirus control measures remain a central concern for workplaces, especially with more employers encouraging a return to office (or some form of hybrid working). This article looks at the indoor climatic conditions most conducive to coronavirus survival and, based on these risk factors, considers the optimal mitigation measures that can be considered for lowering viral transmission. Not every mitigation measure will be practicable, and the balance is towards the use of portable HEPA filtered units. This article considers these factors from the perspective of a standard room (such as an office). Published as: Sandle, T. (2021) Return To Office: Coronavirus, Risk, And Control Of The Indoor Environment, IVT Network, 26th August 2021, at: https://www.ivtnetwork.com/article/return-office-coronavirus-risk-and-control-indoor-environment
2020
In mid-February, as my latest teaching contract at Lincoln University approached its end, COVID-19 was a very distant problem. Only a week or so later and COVID was a very real and much closer problem as hundreds of Chinese students started returning to Lincoln from their combined Christmas break and Chinese New Year celebrations. As March began, the scale of the pandemic became global and personal. All China Southern Air flights from Christchurch through China were cancelled, and, as a consequence, my flight to Ireland via Guangzhou no longer existed. A week after arriving in Ireland, using a rearranged flight via Dubai, the Irish government initiated unprecedented actions: schools were closed, six nations rugby was postponed, and, as a potent symbol of the perceived threat, Dublin’s St Patrick’s Day parade was sadly cancelled.
The pandemic is fast moving, accelerating rapid changes that lead to new challenges and making organizations suffer an impact. A big mark has been left on the workplaces - places where we do business, because an ongoing change to remote work challenges the role of the office. It is highly possible that as the change is progressing, it is not only the workplace that will change its design, but also the way in which work will be planned, organized, done and controlled. However, as the restrictions ease up questions appear: What is the potential of office sustainability? How has the perception of flexible office space changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic? This paper used an online survey as a quantitative research method. In this paper, we looked at the employer’s vision of the office. We investigated employers’ perspectives of where and in what settings the work will be done in the post-pandemic time. Specifically, we discussed the changes employers will apply in terms of work environ...
International Journal of Medical Students
This article summarizes the novel experiences of a team of medical interns posted at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, Mumbai in the midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The authors describe the protocols, guidelines, duties and procedures that were to be followed while deputed to screen the incoming international passengers for possible exposure and symptoms of coronavirus. For the young healthcare workers, in the early days of their internship, being a part of this team was no less than a roller coaster ride. From anxiety and excitement to fatigue and crippling exhaustion, the authors narrate their ordeal as young COVID warriors on duty.
Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 2021
The very first email I received that mentioned the novel coronavirus disease 2019 was on February 14, 2020. Valentine’s Day. In a newsletter summarizing science highlights, a few short sentences announced the name of this new virus that had infected thousands of people as “COVID-19,” and the fact that experts had yet to find a good method for its diagnosis. The second email about COVID-19 that I received was from work on February 25; it explained that the spread of the virus was likely to impact international travel. It provided information from the Centers for Disease Control and recommendations to wash hands and use hand sanitizer to prevent its spread. There was no mention of wearing masks yet. In the subsequent weeks, I heard from more organizations and groups I’m affiliated with about the emergence of this disease and speculation from each group about the seriousness of the situation. For many people at that point, it was something too strange or too worrying to think about. But for me, this disease led to an entirely new line of research.
Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings
was conducted to better understand the challenge of adapting idealized infection control design guides to site-specific conditions during a pandemic. The study aimed to capture quick interventions that are working, offer a new hypothesis and framework to guide future design interventions, and share lessons to assist other medical facilities as they pursue their own necessary spatial adaptations moving forward. Three units repurposed for COVID-19 were studied. Using action cameras and cloud-based videoconferencing, clinicians helped designers remotely peer in real time to active COVID-19 units, create "heatmap" annotations of perceived risk by frontline clinicians, and conduct interviews with decision makers. The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged health care systems around the world to provide safe and effective care. Leveraging spatial design, architecture, and design hacks offers an untapped opportunity to support infection prevention and improved team dynamics, ultimately improving the safety and the effectiveness of the health care team by creating an environment that supports infection prevention and team function.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.